Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Dental Medicine / Faculty of Dental Medicine >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >
Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following tongue and hard palate stimulation on the preferred chewing side.
This item is licensed under:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Title: | Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following tongue and hard palate stimulation on the preferred chewing side. |
Authors: | Maezawa, Hitoshi Browse this author →KAKEN DB | Hirai, Yoshiyuki Browse this author →KAKEN DB | Shiraishi, Hideaki Browse this author →KAKEN DB | Funahashi, Makoto Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Keywords: | magnetoencephalography | mastication | preferred chewing side | primary somatosensory cortex | somatosensory evoked fields | somatosensory evoked potentials | trigeminal nerve |
Issue Date: | 15-Dec-2014 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Journal Title: | Journal of the neurological sciences |
Volume: | 347 |
Issue: | 1-2 |
Start Page: | 288 |
End Page: | 294 |
Publisher DOI: | 10.1016/j.jns.2014.10.025 |
PMID: | 25455302 |
Abstract: | Although oral sensory feedback is essential for mastication, whether the cortical activity elicited by oral stimulation is associated with the preferred chewing side (PCS) is unclear. Somatosensory evoked fields were measured in 12 healthy volunteers (6 with the right side as the PCS and 6 with the left side as the PCS) following tongue and hard palate stimulation. Three components were identified over the contralateral (P40m, P60m, and P80m) and ipsilateral [P40m(I), P60m(I), and P80m(I)] hemispheres. Since no component was consistently detected across subjects, we evaluated the cortical activity over each hemisphere using the activated root-mean-square (aRMS), which was the mean amplitude of the 18-channel RMS between 10 and 150ms. For tongue stimulation, the aRMS for each hemisphere was 8.23 ± 1.55 (contralateral, mean ± SEM) and 4.67 ± 0.88 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the PCS, and 5.11 ± 1.10 (contralateral) and 4.03 ± 0.82 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the non-PCS. For palate stimulation, the aRMS was 5.35 ± 0.58 (contralateral) and 4.62 ± 0.67 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the PCS, and 4.63 ± 0.56 (contralateral) and 4.14 ± 0.60 (ipsilateral)fT/cm for the non-PCS. For hard palate stimulation, the aRMS did not differ between the PCS and non-PCS, whereas for tongue stimulation, the contralateral hemisphere aRMS was significantly greater for the PCS than for the non-PCS. Thus, our results show that lateralized cortical activation was associated with the PCS for tongue, but not hard palate, stimulation; a potential reason for this may be the different sensory-inputs between these two areas, specifically the presence or absence of fine motor function. |
Rights: | © 2014. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Type: | article (author version) |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60460 |
Appears in Collections: | 歯学院・歯学研究院 (Graduate School of Dental Medicine / Faculty of Dental Medicine) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)
|
Submitter: 前澤 仁志
|