2024-03-29T11:29:09Zhttps://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace-oai/requestoai:eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp:2115/329712022-11-17T02:08:08Zhdl_2115_20039hdl_2115_116Round-trip Catadromous Migration in a Japanese Amphipod, Sternomoera rhyaca (Gammaridea: Eusiridae)Kuribayashi, Keiko1000040113542Katakura, HaruoKyono, Masaki1000080374205Dick, Matthew H.Mawatari, Shunsuke F.open access(c) 日本動物学会 / 本文献の公開は著者の意思に基づくものであるadaptationamphipodcatadromydiadromyfitnessmigrationosmoregulationreproductionsalinitysurvivorship480We conducted a field study of the life cycle of the eusirid gammaridean amphipod Sternomoera rhyaca Kuribayashi, Mawatari, and Ishimaru, 1996 in a stream at Gokibiru, Hokkaido, Japan over the course of two non-consecutive years. This species is biennial; it spends most of its life in freshwater, but undertakes a short catadromous migration to the sea for reproduction. Reproduction occurs from March-June. Mature adults drift downstream to the sea singly and in precopulating pairs. Copulation and oviposition in the marsupium occur in mixed water at the stream mouth. Males die after copulation; ovigerous females return upstream by walking or swimming, where their eggs develop and hatch, after which the females also die. Juveniles remain in the stream, growing until they reach sexual maturity. Laboratory experiments showed that survivorship of all stages was lowest in seawater and highest in freshwater, though juveniles survived equally well in mixed water (50% seawater) and freshwater. Eggs developed to hatching only in freshwater; hatchlings in seawater and mixed water died within one and 21 days, respectively. Thus, S. rhyaca is well adapted to freshwater. Indeed, the only stages that required elevated salinity were copulation and subsequent oviposition, and we speculate that freshwater inhibits the female pre-reproductive molt. Because the life cycle of S. rhyaca has the most ontogenetically and temporally restricted saltwater phase known in any catadromous animal, its origin and maintenance are of evolutionary interest. We discuss two alternative hypotheses for the origin of the migratory life cycle, and discuss its maintenance in terms of fitness costs and benefits.日本動物学会2006-09engjournal articleVoRhttp://hdl.handle.net/2115/32971http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-archive&issn=0289-0003https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.23.7630289-0003Zoological Science239763774https://eprints.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2115/32971/1/i0289-0003-23-9-763.pdfapplication/pdf1.16 MB2006-09