[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[drf:2680] Re: The Birth of the Open Access Movement



土屋先生、皆様
OAI-PMHを生み出す元となった1999年10月21日のサンタフェ会議を
オープン・アクセスの起源とみて、12周年おめでとう、というのが
エリック・ヴァン・デ・ヴェルデという人の最初の投稿ですね。
ハーナッドは、80年代あるいは70年代にまでさかのぼるかもしれない
アノニマスFTPでの自発的な論文公開を起源とするか、そうでなければ、
BOAIおよびオープン・アクセスという言葉を生み出した2001年の
ブダペスト会議を起源とすべきだと主張しているわけですね。
エリックさんはそれに対して、どんな運動もいくつかの起源を持つわけ
だが、サンタフェはいろいろな意味で思い出深くて、そのうちの一つが
ハーナッドさん初めてあなたに会ったことですよ!と大人の対応をされ
てますね。
なお、私の誤読でなければ、ハーナッドとサンタフェ会議の世話人だっ
たArXivのギンズパーグとはその後の報道をめぐる行き違いがあって、
同年11月30日を最後に言葉を交わしていないとのことですね。
こういう人間関係のもつれがあったとは知りませんでした。
それにしてもハーナッド先生は当時のやり取りをちゃんとアーカイブ
しているんですね。ちょっと怖いかも(^^;)。

   栗山 正光
   常磐大学人間科学部

--- "Syun Tutiya" <tutiya @ xxxxxxxxxx> ---

>みなさま、
>
>> 明日はオープン・アクセス20周年記念日だそうです。
>
>すいませんが、12周年でした。しかし、ハーナッドはなにやら文句をいってい
>ますね。
>
>土屋
>-----
>Date:         Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:49:38 -0400
>From:         Stevan Harnad <amsciforum @ xxxxxxxxx>
>To:           AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM @ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject:      Re: The Birth of the Open Access Movement
>Reply-To:     American Scientist Open Access Forum <AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM @ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Approved-By: amsciforum @ xxxxxxxxx
>X-Mew: Text/Plain in Multipart/Alternative as a singlepart
>
>I hate to have to throw a blanket on this 12th birthday parade, but the
>birth of the Open Archives Initiative (OAI)  (a protocol for making online
>bibliographic databases -- initially called "archives," later re-baptised
>"repositories -- interoperable) in 1999 certainly was *not* the birth of the
>Open Access Movement.
>http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february00/vandesompel-oai/02vandesompel-oai.html
>
>Either the Open Access Movement began (as I prefer to think) in the '80s or
>perhaps even the '70s, when (some) researchers first began making their
>papers freely accessible online in anonymous FTP archives, or it began with
>the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI, 2001) where the term "Open
>Access" was first coined (a few months after, just as "Open Archives" was
>coined a few months after the Santa Fe meeting).
>http://www.soros.org/openaccess
>
>Nothing here to compete in primacy for, however, since the progress of the
>OA movement has been dismayingly slow, ever since, and still is, to this
>very day.
>
>But it's particularly ironic to see the origins of the OA movement (warts
>and all) attributed to OAI when in fact the idea of freeing the refereed
>research literature from access toll barriers was very explicitly (and
>exceedingly rudely) disavowed by the prime organizer of the three organizers
>of the Santa Fe meeting. The archival record for this seems to have
>disappeared, but I've saved the two postings from which the following is
>excerpted:
>
>*Tue, 30 Nov 1999 20:14:30 -0700*
>"…someone also forwarded me from the times higher ed supp 12 nov 1999:
>
>*"Harnad, who attended the Santa Fe meeting, said all conference
>participants agreed that scientific and scholarly publishing was being 'held
>hostage' and **needed to be freed. 'They all felt ... . Most wanted...'"*
>
>
>"i don't remember anyone saying anything about hostages (though i did miss
>the end of the first day) -- isn't it demagoguery to impute words and
>sentiments?..."
>
>The rest of the posting expands on these sentiments:
>
>http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Temp/oai1.htm
>http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/harnad/Temp/oai2.htm
>
>
>30 November will also be the 12th anniversary of the last time I ever
>exchanged words with the prime organizer in question.
>
>Stevan Harnad
> 
> 
>
>
>──────────────────☆────────
>月刊DRF http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/gekkandrf/
> 2011年10月号を発行しました!
>
>DRF(Digital Repository Federation)
>http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/drf/ 
>─────★─────────────────────

 
 


──────────────────☆────────
月刊DRF http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/gekkandrf/
 2011年10月号を発行しました!

DRF(Digital Repository Federation)
http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/drf/ 
─────★─────────────────────