|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
哲学 = Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University >
第41号 >
探究と論証 : アリストテレス『分析論後書』B1-10における諸相
| Title: | 探究と論証 : アリストテレス『分析論後書』B1-10における諸相 |
| Other Titles: | Inquiry and Demonstration : Aristotle's Posterior Analytics B1-10 |
| Authors: | 日吉, 大輔1 Browse this author |
| Authors(alt): | Hiyoshi, Daisuke1 |
| Issue Date: | 17-Jul-2005 |
| Publisher: | 北海道大学哲学会 |
| Journal Title: | 哲学 |
| Journal Title(alt): | Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University |
| Volume: | 41 |
| Start Page: | 1 |
| End Page: | 19 |
| Abstract: | In Posterior Analytics B1-10, Aristotle constructs theory of inquiry, which has two crucial theses: (a) “everything which is inquired is the inquiry into a middle term” and (b) “what it is and why it is are the same.” These are concerned with definition and demonstration. Then I will show how the relation between (a) and (b) is, while he seems to put them as mutually dependent conceptions in the relevant context. I distinguish B1-10 into three phases: phase 1; practice of inquiry (B1-2), phase 2; traditional framework (B3-7), phase 3; his theory of inquiry (B8-10).These three phases, I think, reflect on the relation between (a) and (b), and provide us backgrounds of the construction of the theory. Especially, phase 2 maintains the balance of definition and demonstration in the beginning of B8 on the basis of a traditional concept; essence. |
| Type: | bulletin (article) |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35030 |
| Appears in Collections: | 哲学 = Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University > 第41号
|
|
