HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
医学研究院・医学院  >
雑誌発表論文等  >

How do case presentation teaching methods affect learning outcomes?-SNAPPS and the One-Minute preceptor

この資料はクリエイティブ・コモンズ・ライセンスの下で公開されています。

フルテキスト
12909_2016_531_MOESM1_ESM.docxAdditional file16.88 kBMicrosoft Word XML見る/開く
s12909-016-0531-6.pdfFull text1.28 MBPDF見る/開く
この文献へのリンクには次のURLを使用してください:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60819

タイトル: How do case presentation teaching methods affect learning outcomes?-SNAPPS and the One-Minute preceptor
著者: Seki, Masayasu 著作を一覧する
Otaki, Junji 著作を一覧する
Breugelmans, Raoul 著作を一覧する
Komoda, Takayuki 著作を一覧する
Nagata-Kobayashi, Shizuko 著作を一覧する
Akaishi, Yu 著作を一覧する
Hiramoto, Jun 著作を一覧する
Ohno, Iwao 著作を一覧する
Harada, Yoshimi 著作を一覧する
Hirayama, Yoji 著作を一覧する
Izumi, Miki 著作を一覧する
キーワード: SNAPPS
One-Minute Preceptor
Teaching method
Junior resident
Case presentation
発行日: 2016年 1月13日
出版者: BioMed Central
誌名: BMC medical education
巻: 16
開始ページ: 12
出版社 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0531-6
抄録: Background: Various techniques have been developed to enable preceptors to teach residents effectively in outpatient settings to promote active learning, including SNAPPS and the One-Minute Preceptor (OMP). This study aimed to ascertain the differences between SNAPPS and the OMP in case presentation content and learner evaluation when used to teach residents about case presentation. Methods: From 2011 to 2013, participants were 71 junior clinical residents employed in two hospitals for clinical training. They were randomly allocated to two groups, one using SNAPPS and the other the OMP. From recorded discussions, the "differential diagnoses", "questions and uncertainties", "treatment plans", and "learning issues" were counted. Also, a self-evaluation form was distributed at the end of the study to evaluate the residents' satisfaction with the case presentation. Results: Members of the SNAPPS group used significantly more meaning units related to questions and uncertainties compared with those of the OMP group (P < 0.001). Self-evaluation sheets revealed that members of the SNAPPS group had significantly higher positive responses than those of the OMP group in terms of the following evaluations: "It was easy to bring up questions and uncertainties" (P = 0.046), "It was easy to present the case efficiently" (P = 0.002), "It was easy to present the case in the sequence given" (P = 0.029), and "I was able to give an in-depth case presentation" (P = 0.005). Conclusions: SNAPPS may induce more meaning units related to questions and uncertainties and give more satisfaction to residents than the OMP.
資料タイプ: article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60819
出現コレクション:雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)

提供者: 大滝 純司

 

本サイトに関するご意見・お問い合わせは repo at lib.hokudai.ac.jp へお願いします。 - 北海道大学