HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
情報科学研究科  >
雑誌発表論文等  >

Simile or Not Simile? : Automatic Detection of Metonymic Relations in Japanese Literal Comparisons

フルテキスト
Simile or Not Simile- Automatic Detection of Metonymic Relations in Japanese Literal Comparisons.pdf727.12 kBPDF見る/開く
この文献へのリンクには次のURLを使用してください:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/63858

タイトル: Simile or Not Simile? : Automatic Detection of Metonymic Relations in Japanese Literal Comparisons
著者: Dybala, Pawel 著作を一覧する
Rzepka, Rafal 著作を一覧する
Araki, Kenji 著作を一覧する
Sayama, Kohichi 著作を一覧する
キーワード: NLP
AI
metaphor processing
similes
metonymies
発行日: 2016年
出版者: Springer
引用: Human Language Technology. Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics, ISBN:978-3-319-43807-8
誌名: Lecture Notes in Computer Science
巻: 9561
開始ページ: 277
終了ページ: 289
出版社 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43808-5_21
抄録: In this paper we propose a method of automatic distinction between two types of formally identical expressions in Japanese: similes and “metonymical comparisosn”, i.e. literal comparisons that include metonymic relations between elements. Expression like "kujira no you na chiisai me" can be translated into English as "eyes small as whale's", while in Japanese, due to the lack of possessive case, it can be misunderstood as "eyes small as a whale". The reason behind this is the presence of metonymic relation between components of such expressions. In the abovegiven example the word “whale” is a metonymy and represents “whale’s eye”. This is naturally understandable for humans, although formally difficult to detect by automatic algorithms, as both types of expressions (similes and metonymical comparisons) realize the same template. In this work we present a system able to distinguish between these two types of expressions. The system takes a Japanese expession as input and uses the Internet to check possessive relations between its elements. We propose a method of calculating a score based on co-occurrence of source and target pairs in Google (e.g. "whale's eye"). Evaluation experiment showed that the system distinguishes between similes and metonimical comparisons with the accuracy of 74%. We discuss the results and give some ideas for the future.
Rights: The final publication is available at link.springer.com
資料タイプ: article (author version)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/63858
出現コレクション:雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)

提供者: Rafal Rzepka

 

本サイトに関するご意見・お問い合わせは repo at lib.hokudai.ac.jp へお願いします。 - 北海道大学