|
|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Education / Faculty of Education >
北海道大学大学院教育学研究院紀要 = Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Hokkaido University >
第138号 >
「生きづらさ」探究活動についての検討におけるA. W. グールドナー理論の有効性
| Title: | 「生きづらさ」探究活動についての検討におけるA. W. グールドナー理論の有効性 |
| Other Titles: | Effectiveness of theories by A. W. Gouldner in examination of inquiries into “ikizurasa” |
| Authors: | 藤川, 奈月1 Browse this author |
| Authors(alt): | Fujikawa, Natsuki1 |
| Keywords: | グールドナー | | 下部構造 | | Rational Discourse | | 生きづらさ | | 専門家 | | Gouldner | | Infrastructure | | Rational Discourse | | Ikizurasa | | Specialists |
| Issue Date: | 25-Jun-2021 |
| Publisher: | 北海道大学大学院教育学研究院 |
| Journal Title: | 北海道大学大学院教育学研究院紀要 |
| Journal Title(alt): | Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Hokkaido University |
| Volume: | 138 |
| Start Page: | 329 |
| End Page: | 357 |
| Abstract: | 現在，「生きづらさ」という言葉が包括的で多義性を持つ言葉として様々な人の間で使われている。にもかかわらず，専門家による「生きづらさ」の定義付けや理論構築などといった「生きづらさ」探究活動には，多種多様な「生きづらさ」のうちの一部しか反映されていない。本論文は，この現象の構造とそれを乗り越える方途の検討においてA. W. グールドナーの理論を援用することの意義と限界を探るものである。グールドナーの理論を再読し整理した結果，先述の現象の構造は，グールドナーの下部構造論の援用，すなわち，専門家とそれを取り巻く社会や人々との間の相互作用の検討によって説明可能となることが明らかになった。先述の現象を乗り越えるための方途については，グールドナーのRational Discourse論，特に，「知的対話」「限界の自覚」「非権威的理性」「明識としての知」がその一助となるものの，グールドナーの理論だけでは限界もあるということが明らかになった。 | | In Japan, the word “ikizurasa” is used by various people as a comprehensive and ambiguous word. “Ikizurasa” is a Japanese compound word of “ikiru” and “tsurasa”. The former means “to live”, “to be”, “to survive”, “to exist”, “to experience”, etc. The latter adds the meaning “difficult”, “hard”, and “painful” to the former. As the meaning of the word “ikizurasa” is comprehensive and ambiguous, anyone can use the word to explain one’s state.
Currently, many specialists are attempting to understand “ikizurasa”, as well as defining the word, constructing theories, and presenting ways to overcome “ikizurasa”. Although the word is comprehensive and ambiguous, there are some “ikizurasa” that are not reflected by such attempts. This phenomenon has the following problems. (1) Some could be confused by the difference between the published “ikizurasa” and their own interpretation of “ikizurasa”. It may deprive someone of the word which explains their state. (2) By relying solely on a specific framework, it may make someone difficult to recognize or solve their “ikizurasa”. If we are to overcome this phenomenon, we need to know the structure of this phenomenon. When considering the discussions on this topic, theories by A. W. Gouldner could be worth to use. Therefore, this study examines the significance and limitations of using Gouldner's theory in the discussions.
As a result of overviewing and organizing Gouldner's theory, it became clear that the structure of the above-mentioned phenomenon can be explained by using Gouldner's “infrastructure” theory. In other words, we can explain how this phenomenon occurs by examining the interaction between the specialists and their surrounding people/society. It also became clear that Gouldner's “Rational Discourse” theory, especially “dialogue”, “consciousness of limitations”, “non-authoritative reason”, and “awareness” can aid specialists to pick up more “ikizurasa” in their works. This allows for us to continue using the word “ikizurasa” as a comprehensive and ambiguous word. However, it also became clear that we cannot overcome the phenomenon using only Gouldner's theory. |
| Type: | bulletin (article) |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/82165 |
| Appears in Collections: | 北海道大学大学院教育学研究院紀要 = Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Hokkaido University > 第138号
|
|
