[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# [drf:3553] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR

- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:00:59 +0900

    内島様
    > 　natureのブログで、「the fourth time lucky」のような表現がありましたが、これは
    > 日本語でいう「三度目の正直」のような意味でしょうか？

    はい、これまで３回提出されて成立せず、４度目の正直で成立するか？といった意味の
    ようですね。
    ところで、まだきちんと読んでいないのですが、英国の貴族院がRCUKのOAポリシーを批判
    するレポートを出したとのことですね。
    次から次へとニュースが入ってきて、ついていくのが大変です。

    　　　栗山　正光
    　　　常磐大学人間科学部現代社会学科
    　　　〒310-8585 水戸市見和1-430-1

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: 	[GOAL] UK House of Lords Science & Technology Committee: Lack of clarity over open access is "unacceptable"
    Date: 	Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:05:35 +0100
    From: 	Richard Poynder <richard.poynder ＠ xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Reply-To: 	Global Open Access List (Successor of AmSci) <goal ＠ xxxxxxxxxxx>
    To: 	<goal ＠ xxxxxxxxxxx>

    The House of Lords Science & Technology Committee has today published its report on implementation of the UK government’s Open Access policy.

    Commenting, Lord Krebs, Chairman of the House of Lords Science and Technology Committee, said:

    “RCUK did not consult or communicate effectively with key stakeholders in the publishing and academic communities when implementing its open access policy. While we are delighted that our inquiry has shown that RCUK are proposing to phase in their open access policy during the initial five-year implementation phase, this should have been made clear much earlier. That is why we call upon the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills to review how RCUK communicated this important change.

    “There are still many unknowns concerning the impact of the open access policy, which is why RCUK must commit to a wide rangeing review of its policy in 2014, 2016 and before it expects full compliance in 2018. We heard significant concern about the policy’s ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach, and are pleased that RCUK are both aware of these concerns and prepared to act on them.

    “Open access is an inexorable trend. The Government must ensure that in further developing our capabilities to share research they do not inadvertently damage the ‘complex ecosystem’ of research communication in the UK.”

    The report is available here: http://ow.ly/hWw0f

    RCUK’s response is here: http://ow.ly/hWwaE

    Times Higher news story here: http://ow.ly/hWxbT

    A background piece here: http://j.mp/11XPsoX

    ──────────────────☆────────
    月刊DRF http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/gekkandrf/
    　2013年2月臨時増刊号(37号臨時増刊)を発行しました！

    DRF（Digital Repository Federation）
    http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/drf/
    ─────★─────────────────────

- Follow-Ups:
  - [drf:3554] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
    - From: Masamitsu Kuriyama

- References:
  - [drf:3550] アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
    - From: 内島秀樹
  - [drf:3551] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
    - From: Masamitsu Kuriyama
  - [drf:3552] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
    - From: 内島秀樹

- Prev by Date: [drf:3552] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
- Next by Date: [drf:3554] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
- Previous by thread: [drf:3552] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
- Next by thread: [drf:3554] Re: アメリカの新OA義務化法案FASTR
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread