[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

# [drf:2159] DRF7第2セッション質疑落穂　Re: DRF7終了しました

- Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:58:24 +0900

    小樽商大　杉田です。

    日が空いてしまいましたが、DRF7おつかれさまでした。

    (2010/11/29 20:07), Shinji Maeda wrote:
    > は、例年のごとく北海道から沖縄まで多数の皆さまにご参加頂き、
    > 無事に終了致しました。ありがとうございました。m(_ _)m

    第2セッション「機関オープンアクセス方針とは何か――英国レディング大学の
    場合」の進行をつとめました。

    講演者のアンドリュー・Ａ・アダムス先生への質問事項をあらかじめいくつか
    用意していたのですが、現地会場での質問・意見に時間を割いた関係で、当日
    話題に上げられなかったものがありました。残った質問を後日アダムス先生に
    お送りしたところ、次のメッセージをもらいましたので転送します。

    ▼質問（シュプリンガージャパンさんからの事前質問の一部翻案）
    レディング大学では、オープンアクセス方針に沿うために、所属研究者は執筆
    論文の投稿先としてグリーンジャーナルを選ばざるをえないのか（でないとし
    たら、出版社がセルフアーカイブを許容しない場合どうするのか）。
    また、われわれシュプリンガージャパンがＯＡ出版事業に取り組むにあたり、
    オープンアクセス思潮を取り巻く情勢という点で、英国と日本にはどのような
    違いがあるか。

    Sugita-san,

    Reading's mandate requires deposit "if the publisher allows it" and there is
    no requirement only to submit to journals with a Green or Pale Green (Pale
    Green includes a time embargo) policy. In my view this is the biggest
    weakn4ess of the Reading deposit policy, which should require deposit of the
    author text whatever the journal policy, but should then set whether the
    access is open (if the journal is green) time embargoed (if the journal is
    pale green) and closed access (if the journal is grey). Individual
    researchers can then use the request button to ask for an individual copy to
    be emailed to them by the author thus providing almost-OA (if authors
    respond, which is made very easy by the eprints software) even where the
    journal is grey.

    In terms of the second element, any advice for Springer on OA publishing. My
    role is to promote OA, and the only proven way towards that for all research
    is via IRs and deposit mandates. Changes to the way journal publishing
    operates is an entirely separate issue and really a matter for the people
    involved in journal publishing to figure out a sustainable business model and
    profit margins. Here's some of my thoughts on the issues, though.

    There is more than enough resources in academic to provide for the necessary
    services involved in maintaining journal publications. Whether the is and
    will continue to be, enough resources to provide a significant profit for
    service providers in this area partly depends on what real value-added
    services they're offering, how they manage their relationship with academia,
    and how far inertia maintains a system whereby the middlemen have too much
    power (and (ab)use that power to try to squeeze excxess profits out). There
    is a growing issue with regards to copyright transfer policies whereby the
    simplicity of copyright transfer to publishers in return for dissemination is
    being abused by publishers to demand payment for things like re-use of one's
    own work, or re-use of small parts of the work of others. This is beginning
    to undermine academic tolerance for publishers. The fact that I had to ask
    for permission from Springer (as it happens) for permission for one of my
    co-authors to use a diagram I had created as part of a paper published in
    AI&Society in another of their papers really annoyed me. While Springer at
    this point granted permission and didn't demand payment, the fact that I
    created the figure and was forced in order to publish in the relevant journal
    AI&Society to transfer all rights to Springer and then have to beg for
    permission for my co-authors to reuse my figure (drawn from mutual ideas, I
    just happened to be the "artist") really galls. If Springer want to position
    themselves as the pre-eminent professional academic publisher with a good
    chance of surviving and continuing to collaborate with the academy they
    really need to abandon the copyright transfer and move to a license to
    publish. Returning the copyright of all previous transferred articles to
    their author(s) while retaining the appropriate rights to disseminate the
    articles would be a very positive move, though I doubt the shareholders of
    Springer would authorise such a move.

    A recent issue that's come up in terms of the internationalisation of
    Japanese academia is the question of translations of journal articles. Still,
    many Japanese researchers primarily publish in Japanese and it is likely that
    even where they are encouraged to publish in English many would be happier
    publishing a paper first in Japanese, getting it reviewed and polished in the
    Japanese version, and then to translate the article into English and submit
    it for wider dissemination. However, this raises copyright issues because the
    original work (and this can happen if the paper is first published in English
    and the author desires to produce a Japanese translation as well) has often
    had to have its copyright transferred to the publisher and there is then a
    question as to whether permission will be granted for translation rights.
    Even if they don't adopt the license to publish (I would be happy to sign a
    license to publish preventing me from allowing professional publication of my
    work elsewhere, even) adopting a policy that grants the right to translate
    the work into other languages explicitly and pre-emptively would help the
    Japanese situation. Again, my AI&Society article was granted this permission
    individually, and Springer have included the Japanese version in the online
    appendix to the English version of the article, but the hassle and the
    feeling associated with having to ask permission damages the relationship
    between academics and publishers, in my view, even where permission is always
    forthcoming. There is always a worry that perhaps next time a charge will be
    levied or permission refused. Remember, I gave my work without financial
    compensation and I'm not getting financial compensation for derivative works
    or the inclusion of elements in other papers, and having to ask permission of
    someone else is just downright unpleasant in these circumstances.

    --
    杉田茂樹 <ssugita ＠ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    小樽商科大学学術情報課長（附属図書館）
    電話番号：0134-27-5269，ファクシミリ：0134-27-5278
    http://barrel.ih.otaru-uc.ac.jp

    ─────────────────────☆──────────
    12月22日は3会場でWSを開催します！

    　DRF-Tokyo DRF地域ワークショップ(関東地区)(慶応義塾大学)
    　http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/drf/index.php?drf-tokyo

    　DRF-ARt+Music+Sports DRF主題ワークショップ(芸術・音楽・体育)(東京藝術大学)
    　http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/drf/index.php?DRF-ARMS

    　DRF/ShaRe-Kyushu　DRF/ShaRe地域ワークショップ（九州地区)（九州大学）
    　http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/drf/index.php?DRF%2FShaRe-Kyushu%2BDRF%2FShaRe

    たくさんのご来場ありがとうございました！
    　11月25日　DRF全国ワークショップ in 図書館総合展（DRF7）
    　http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp　/drf/index.php?DRF7

    DRF（Digital Repository Federation）
    http://drf.lib.hokudai.ac.jp/drf/
    ─────★──────────────────────────

- References:
  - [drf:2149] DRF7終了しました
    - From: Shinji Maeda

- Prev by Date: [drf:2158] Re: 新潟県立看護大学リポジトリ公開しました
- Next by Date: [drf:2160] 日本哺乳類学会 Mammal Study 掲載文献のIR収録について
- Previous by thread: [drf:2149] DRF7終了しました
- Next by thread: [drf:2151] 月刊DRF第10号を刊行しました。
- Index(es):
  - Date
  - Thread