二重負担を受容する有配偶女性の意識の規定要因 : 全国調査SSP2015 を用いた資源の影響の検証

樋口, 麻里

doi:https://doi.org/10.14943/bfhhs.160.l97

二重負担を受容する有配偶女性の意識の規定要因 : 全国調査SSP2015 を用いた資源の影響の検証

樋口, 麻里

北海道大学文学研究院紀要, 2020, 160, 97(左)-119(左)

Permalink : https://doi.org/10.14943/bfhhs.160.l97

このアイテムのアクセス数:1,410件（2026-08-13 01:07 集計）

閲覧可能ファイル

ファイル	フォーマット	サイズ	閲覧回数	説明
160_08_Higuchi	pdf	1.01 MB	1,840

論文情報

ファイル出力 EndNote Basic出力 Mendeley出力

アクセス権	open access
DOI	https://doi.org/10.14943/bfhhs.160.l97
URI	https://hdl.handle.net/2115/78850
タイトル	二重負担を受容する有配偶女性の意識の規定要因 : 全国調査SSP2015 を用いた資源の影響の検証
タイトル	Factors Influencing the Attitude of Married Women to Support for the Unequal Gender Norm of "Working and Caring" in Japan
著者	e-Rad_Researcher 80755851 著者名樋口, 麻里 Higuchi, Mari
言語	日本語
キーワード	gender role attitude
	double burden
	caring role
	caring-jobs
発行日	2020-03-31
出版者	北海道大学文学研究院
収録物名	北海道大学文学研究院紀要
収録物名	Bulletin of the Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences, Hokkaido University
巻(号)	160
ページ	97(左)-119(左)
抄録	Previous studies suggest that Japanese women's attitude toward gender is one of the keys to understanding their obstinate resistance to gender equality in household work: on one hand, few women support existing restrictions on their participation in the labour market, yet on the other hand they are in favour of assigning themselves caring roles at homes. However, why women themselves support such a double burden norm of "working and caring" has not been adequately clarified. Using SSP2015 data and focusing on married women, this paper examines four hypotheses to investigate factors behind women's support for the "working and caring" norm. The first is the "household contribution hypothesis," which focuses on relative resources. It assumes that women's lower contribution to household income is associated with their greater support for the "working and caring" norm. The other three hypotheses -- the "education hypothesis," the "time availability hypothesis," and the "social evaluation hypothesis" -- focus on women's absolute resources. The social evaluation hypothesis assumes that if women are socially and economically evaluated through their jobs, they are more likely to reject the "working and caring" norm. It is a new hypothesis examined in this paper by looking at women's employment status, with a special focus on whether they work in caring-jobs or not. It can be imagined that if women use their caring skills in the labour market, they no longer adhere to take on a caring role at home. Results of my analysis generally support my hypotheses, except for the time availability hypothesis. Conditions such as lower contribution to the household income, lower level of education, irregular employment, and occupations other than caring-jobs go hand in hand with greater support by women for the "working and caring" than the "sharing both" norm.
資源タイプ	紀要論文
出版タイプ	Version of Record
PISSN	2434-9771