|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Hokkaido University Hospital >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >
A Prospective Comparative Study of Three Sets of Criteria for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation : ISTH Criteria vs Japanese Criteria
| Title: | A Prospective Comparative Study of Three Sets of Criteria for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation : ISTH Criteria vs Japanese Criteria |
| Authors: | Hayakawa, Mineji Browse this author | | Gando, Satoshi Browse this author | | Hoshino, Hirokatsu Browse this author |
| Keywords: | Disseminated intravascular coagulation | | Diagnostic criteria | | Hemostatic disorders | | International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis | | Japan |
| Issue Date: | Jan-2007 |
| Publisher: | SAGE Publications |
| Journal Title: | Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis |
| Volume: | 13 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Start Page: | 65 |
| End Page: | 72 |
| Publisher DOI: | 10.1177/1076029606296405 |
| PMID: | 17164497 |
| Abstract: | Clinical and laboratory criteria and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) were recently published by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). In Japan, the DIC Diagnostic Standards published in 1988 have been widely used for more than 10 years. In a general intensive care unit, we prospectively compared the diagnostic properties of the overt DIC, non-overt DIC, and Japanese DIC criteria sets, and investigated the influences of each set on patient morbidity and mortality. Seventy-four patients with platelet counts below 150 x 10^9/L were included in this study. Blood samples were collected daily from day 0 to day 4 after inclusion in the study. The Japanese DIC included the overt DIC and both of these were included in the non-overt DIC. The Japanese DIC criteria diagnosed DIC earlier than the non-overt DIC criteria did (p = 0.020). The DIC patients diagnosed by the Japanese criteria and those diagnosed by the overt DIC criteria showed a higher incidence of multiple organ failure than those without DIC (p = 0.013 and p = 0.022, respectively). The Japanese and the non-overt DIC criteria tended to predict patient prognoses effectively. In conclusion, the Japanese and the non-overt DIC criteria are of value in predicting outcome. However, the non-overt DIC criteria take more time to diagnose DIC than the Japanese criteria do. A more precise clinical study is needed to determined appropriate specific criteria and cut-ff points in the non-overt DIC criteria set. |
| Type: | article (author version) |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/38599 |
| Appears in Collections: | 北海道大学病院 (Hokkaido University Hospital) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)
|
Submitter: 早川 峰司
|
