|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Science / Faculty of Science >
北海道大学地球物理学研究報告 = Geophysical bulletin of Hokkaido University >
第73号 >
経験的グリーン関数法による2009年８月11日駿河湾の地震（MJMA 6.5）の震源モデルの推定と強震動シミュレーション
| Title: | 経験的グリーン関数法による2009年８月11日駿河湾の地震（MJMA 6.5）の震源モデルの推定と強震動シミュレーション |
| Other Titles: | Source modeling and strong motion simulation of the 2009 Suruga Bay earthquake（MJMA 6.5）using the empirical Green's function method |
| Authors: | 浅野, 公之1 Browse this author | | 岩田, 知孝2 Browse this author |
| Authors(alt): | ASANO, Kimiyuki1 | | IWATA, Tomotaka2 |
| Issue Date: | 19-Mar-2010 |
| Publisher: | 北海道大学大学院理学研究院自然史科学部門（地球物理学） |
| Journal Title: | 北海道大学地球物理学研究報告 |
| Journal Title(alt): | Geophysical bulletin of Hokkaido University |
| Volume: | 73 |
| Start Page: | 137 |
| End Page: | 147 |
| Abstract: | On August 11, 2009, an intraplate earthquake （MJMA 6.5） occurred within the subducting Philippine Sea slab beneath Suruga Bay at a depth of 23 km. The source model composed of two strong motion generation areas（SMGA）has been estimated by the broadband strong motion simulation using the empirical Green's function method in the frequency range between 0.3 Hz and 10 Hz. The stress drop of each SMGA is estimated to be 35.7 MPa and 27.5 MPa. The rupture of SMGA 1 on the southeast dipping fault plane mainly propagated southwestward, and that of SMGA 2 on the northeast dipping fault plane propagated northwestward. The obtained source model explains the observed acceleration, velocity, and displacement waveforms of this event in the broadband frequency range fairly well. Then, the size of SMGA for the 2009 Suruga Bay earthquake is compared with the scaling relationship by previous studies on other intraslab and inland crustal earthquakes. The size of SMGA for intraslab earthquakes in the previous studies is generally smaller than that for inland crustal earthquakes. In contrast, the SMGA of the 2009 Suruga Bay earthquake is almost comparable to the empirical scaling relationship for inland crustal earthquakes. That difference is mainly because the relatively shallower source depth of this event compared to other intraslab earthquakes. For advanced strong motion prediction for intraslab earthquakes, it could be necessary to adopt depth-dependency and regional differences in stress drop on SMGA or asperity in the source modeling. |
| Type: | bulletin (article) |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/44469 |
| Appears in Collections: | 北海道大学地球物理学研究報告 = Geophysical bulletin of Hokkaido University > 第73号
|
|
