HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere >
Eurasian journal of forest research >
Vol.15-1 >

Understanding High Altitude Reforestation in Mt. Apo, Philippines

Files in This Item:
EJFR15-1_004.pdf499.82 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/49967

Title: Understanding High Altitude Reforestation in Mt. Apo, Philippines
Authors: Anticamara, Jonathan A. Browse this author
Pasion, Bonifacio O. Browse this author
Gonzales, Regielene S. Browse this author
Duya, Mariano Roy M. Browse this author
Ong, Perry S. Browse this author
Keywords: Forest Management
Forest Recovery and Resiliency
Philippines Forest
Reforestation
Restoration
Tropical Diversity
Issue Date: Aug-2012
Publisher: Hokkaido University Forests, EFRC
Journal Title: Eurasian Journal of Forest Research
Volume: 15
Issue: 1
Start Page: 31
End Page: 43
Abstract: Comparing the difference in forest community structure between a reforested area and a nearby old growth forest is one way to evaluate the ability of a disturbed forest to recover. Here, we show how a high altitude reforested area in Mt. Apo, Philippines is recovering relative to a nearby old growth forest. The species richness of understory vegetation in the old growth forest did not differ significantly from the 11 year-old reforested area, suggesting fast recovery in this aspect. However, the tree assemblage and sizes (i.e., Diameter at Breast Height) in the old growth forest had significantly higher tree diversity as well as larger trees than the reforested area, suggesting slower recovery in this aspect. In addition, the dominant species in terms of understory vegetation cover, tree abundance, and sizes differed significantly between the old growth forest and the 11 year-old reforested area. In general, the composition and structure of vegetation communities (understory and trees) in the old growth forest and the 11 year-old reforested area were about 13-29% similar. This means that, without management interventions (e.g., assisted recovery), it would probably take much longer time (than 11 years) for the reforested area to get to same condition as the nearby old growth forest. More importantly, results showed which aspects of the reforested area could be adjusted to potentially hasten its recovery towards the old growth forest status.
Type: bulletin (article)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/49967
Appears in Collections:Eurasian journal of forest research > Vol.15-1

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar )


 

Feedback - Hokkaido University