Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
北方言語研究 = Northern Language Studies >
第5号 >
イテリメン語の否定の構造
Title: | イテリメン語の否定の構造 |
Other Titles: | Negative Structures in Itelmen |
Authors: | 小野, 智香子1 Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Authors(alt): | Ono, Chikako1 |
Issue Date: | 20-Mar-2015 |
Publisher: | 北海道大学大学院文学研究科 |
Journal Title: | 北方言語研究 |
Volume: | 5 |
Start Page: | 39 |
End Page: | 53 |
Abstract: | Itelmen negative structures are classified as follows: (A) suffix-type negation and (B) finite-type negation.
(A) suffix-type negation:
negative particle (qaʔm, zaq, wijaq) + LV(lexical verb)-negative suffix (+ AUXiliary verb)
(B) finite-type negation:
negative particle (χeʔnc) + finite verb (optative or subjunctive mood)
Negation in suffix-type (A) is double-marked with a negative particle and the negative suffix, while negation in finite-type (B) is marked only by the negative particle. Each negative particle has a different negative function and co-occurs with a different finite form:
qaʔm + LV-kaq/-(a)q (+ AUX in indicative past and present tense) - negation in the non-future
zaq + LV-kaq/-(a)q (+ AUX in second person optative) - negative imperative
wijaq + LV-kaq/-(a)q (or other suffixes) (+ AUX in subjunctive or optative) - non-factive or prohibitive
χeʔnc + LV in optative or subjunctive finite form - negation in the future or non-factive
The distinction between the indicative and optative that exists in the affirmative is lost in the future negative. In Itelmen, negation in the non-future is marked as realis (indicative past/present tense), while negation in the future and non-factive is marked as irrealis (optative or subjunctive). In conclusion, negation in Itelmen has a strong connection with the mood category, and especially with the reality status (realis/irrealis distinction). |
Type: | bulletin (article) |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/58327 |
Appears in Collections: | 北方言語研究 = Northern Language Studies > 第5号
|
|