HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Agriculture / Faculty of Agriculture >
北海道大学農經論叢 = The Review of the Society of Agricultural Economics >
第70集 >

農家数規模別にみた農業集落における農家数の規定要因 : 分位点回帰モデルによるアプローチ

Files in This Item:
p.17-24.pdf776.64 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60426

Title: 農家数規模別にみた農業集落における農家数の規定要因 : 分位点回帰モデルによるアプローチ
Other Titles: Factors affecting the number of farm househelds in rural communities : A quantile count regression approach
Authors: 石田, 泰浩1 Browse this author
中谷, 朋昭2 Browse this author →KAKEN DB
高山, 太輔3 Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Authors(alt): Ishida, Yasuhiro1
Nakatani, Tomoaki2
Takayama, Taisuke3
Issue Date: 30-Nov-2015
Publisher: 北海道大学大学院農学研究院
Journal Title: 北海道大学農經論叢
Journal Title(alt): The Nokei Ronso : The Review of Agricultural Economics Hokkaido University
Volume: 70
Start Page: 17
End Page: 24
Abstract: Problems such as a decline in the farmer population, population aging, and urbanization have been progressing in rural communities. In small rural communities with few farms, small farms play an important role in cummunity sustenance and functionality. Therefore, a policy that helps sustain the current number of farms, including small farms, in rural communities in necessary. Simultaneously, Japan's agricultural sector has been urged to reduce small farms, and to consolidate farms to increase competitiveness. This is at odds with the need to maintain rural community functioning and domestic agricultural production. Thus, to crease better policies, it is nesessary to analyze the relationship between the local characteristics of rural communities and farm termination. Acconrdingly, we analyzed the factors affecting the number of farm households in Hokkaido using rural community card date in a quantile count regression model. The results show that age diversity in farm household populations and the proportion of the population aged between 60 and 64 has large positive and negative effects, respectively, on the changes in the number of farm households over all percentiles. Rice farming and the existence of successors have significant positive effects only at the 5th, 25th, and 50th percentiles.
Type: bulletin (article)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60426
Appears in Collections:北海道大学農經論叢 = The Review of the Society of Agricultural Economics > 第70集

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar )


 

Feedback - Hokkaido University