HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Medicine / Faculty of Medicine >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >

Development of a Formula to Correct Particle-Enhanced Turbidimetric Inhibition Immunoassay Values so That it More Precisely Reflects High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Values for Mycophenolic Acid

This item is licensed under:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Files in This Item:
Development_of_a_Formula_to_Correct.3.pdf316.98 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/68546

Title: Development of a Formula to Correct Particle-Enhanced Turbidimetric Inhibition Immunoassay Values so That it More Precisely Reflects High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Values for Mycophenolic Acid
Authors: Nakano, Keiichi Browse this author
Iwami, Daiki Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Yamada, Takehiro Browse this author
Morita, Ken Browse this author
Yasuda, Keiko Browse this author
Shibuya, Hitoshi Browse this author
Kahata, Kaoru Browse this author
Shinohara, Nobuo Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Shimizu, Chikara Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Issue Date: Jan-2018
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Journal Title: Transplantation direct
Volume: 4
Issue: 1
Start Page: e337
Publisher DOI: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000754
Abstract: Background: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentration measured by homogeneous particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINA) may be overestimated due to its cross-reactivity with pharmacologically inactive MPA glucuronide (MPAG), as well as other minor metabolites, accumulated with renal function impairment or co-administered cyclosporine A. In contrast, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) is precise because it can exclude the cross-reactivity. In this study, we assumed HPLC values for MPA (HPLC-MPA) as a reference and aimed to develop a formula correcting PETINA values for MPA (PETINA-MPA) to more precisely reflect HPLC-MPA. Methods: MPA trough concentrations were measured both by HPLC-UV and PETINA in 39 samples issued from 39 solid-organ transplant recipients. MPAG concentrations were also measured using HPLC UV assay. We determined the impacts of renal function and coadministered calcineurin inhibitor on concentrations of MPA and MPAG measured by HPLC. Then, we evaluated the difference between PETINA-MPA and HPLC-MPA. Finally, we develop a formula to reflect HPLC-MPA by using multilinear regression analysis. Results: MPAG concentration was negatively correlated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (R2 = 0.376, P < 0.001), although MPA was not correlated with eGFR. There were no significant differences in MPA or MPAG concentrations per dose between the patients who were co-administered tacrolimus versus cyclosporine A. Finally, we developed the formulas to reflect HPLC-MPA: Formula 1: Estimated MPA concentration = 0.048 + 0.798 × PETINA‐MPA Formula 2: Estimated MPA concentration = - 0.059 + 0.800 × PETINA‐MPA + 0.002 × eGFR However, there was no significant improvement in the coefficient of determination with addition of eGFR in the formula, suggesting that HPLC-MPA can be well predicted by only 1 variable, PETINA-MPA.Conclusions: This study developed a formula so that PETINA-MPA can be corrected to more precisely reflect HPLC-MPA.
Rights: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Type: article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/68546
Appears in Collections:医学院・医学研究院 (Graduate School of Medicine / Faculty of Medicine) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)

Submitter: 岩見 大基

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar_1.0 )

MathJax is now OFF:


 

 - Hokkaido University