Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
哲学 = Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University >
第53号 新田孝彦教授退職記念号 >
『論考』における意義と意味の区別
Title: | 『論考』における意義と意味の区別 |
Other Titles: | Wittgenstein's Distinction between Sinn and Bedeulung in Traclalus |
Authors: | 中川, 大1 Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Authors(alt): | NAKAGAWA, Hajime1 |
Issue Date: | 4-Jan-2019 |
Publisher: | 北海道大学哲学会 |
Journal Title: | 哲学 |
Journal Title(alt): | Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University |
Volume: | 53 |
Start Page: | 81 |
End Page: | 94 |
Abstract: | Ludwig Wittgenstein distinguished Sinn from Bedeutung. In his Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Sinn was assigned to a sentence while Bedeutung was to a name. This distinction was similar to the one by Heinrich Rickert. On the other hand, Gottlob Frege took every expression to be a name, and he assigned both Sinn and Bedeutung to any expression. Did Wittgenstein reject Frege's theory in the Neo-Kantian way? No. Frege criticized the Neo-Kantian theory of values through his distinction between Sinn and Bedeutung, and Wittgenstein advanced Frege's way much more. Nevertheless Wittgenstein's distinction also allied with the realism of Russell and Moore, who disbelieved Frege's theory. |
Type: | bulletin (article) |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/75564 |
Appears in Collections: | 哲学 = Annals of the Philosophical Society of Hokkaido University > 第53号 新田孝彦教授退職記念号
|
|