Title: | Efficacy of 'drive and retrieve' as a cooperative method for prompt endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke |
Authors: | Osanai, Toshiya Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Ito, Yasuhiro Browse this author |
Ushikoshi, Satoshi Browse this author |
Aoki, Takeshi Browse this author |
Kawabori, Masahito Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Fujiwara, Kensuke Browse this author |
Ogasawara, Katsuhiko Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Tokairin, Kikutaro Browse this author |
Maruichi, Katsuhiko Browse this author |
Nakayama, Naoki Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Ono, Kota Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Houkin, Kiyohiro Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Kazumata, Ken Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Keywords: | thrombectomy |
stroke |
intervention |
Issue Date: | Aug-2019 |
Publisher: | BMJ Publishing Group |
Journal Title: | Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery |
Volume: | 11 |
Issue: | 8 |
Start Page: | 757 |
End Page: | 761 |
Publisher DOI: | 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014296 |
Abstract: | Background Outcomes of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke depend on the time interval from onset to reperfusion. Although the centralized 'mothership' method is considered preferable, the required transportation time increases the risk that a patient with a stroke may not receive intravenous or endovascular therapy. In contrast, 'drive and retrieve' describes a system wherein doctors from comprehensive stroke centers travel to primary stroke centers and provide endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Objective To describe the drive and retrieve system and verify the effects of this new collaboration on outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke among facilities. Methods This non-randomized, single-arm study retrospectively analyzed patients who met the inclusion criteria for endovascular treatment provided through a drive and retrieve system. Among the 122 patients treated by this system, we analyzed the time of onset to recanalization as the primary outcome. We also analyzed the efficacy of the drive and retrieve system using geographic information system analysis. Results The median time from onset to recanalization was 229 min (IQR 170-307 min, 95% CI 201 to 252 min). The upper limit of the 95% CI for the time from onset to recanalization was shorter than the median times reported in two previous trials. Geographic information system analysis revealed an upward trend in the population coverage rate in each secondary medical area after the drive and retrieve method was introduced. Conclusion The drive and retrieve method may be an effective form of cooperation between facilities located within 1 hour of a comprehensive stroke center. |
Rights: | This article has been accepted for publication in Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 2019 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014296. c Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. |
Type: | article (author version) |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/76145 |
Appears in Collections: | 医学院・医学研究院 (Graduate School of Medicine / Faculty of Medicine) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)
|