Title: | Development and Practical Test of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure |
Authors: | Hamatani, Yasuhiro Browse this author |
Takada, Yasuko Browse this author |
Miyamoto, Yoshihiro Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Kawano, Yukie Browse this author |
Anchi, Yuta Browse this author |
Shibata, Tatsuhiro Browse this author |
Suzuki, Atsushi Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Nishikawa, Mitsunori Browse this author |
Ito, Hiroto Browse this author |
Kato, Masashi Browse this author |
Shiga, Tsuyoshi Browse this author |
Fukumoto, Yoshihiro Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Izumi, Chisato Browse this author |
Yasuda, Satoshi Browse this author |
Ogawa, Hisao Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Sugano, Yasuo Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Anzai, Toshihisa Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Keywords: | Heart failure |
Palliative care |
Quality indicators |
Issue Date: | Apr-2020 |
Publisher: | 社団法人 日本循環器学会(The Japanese Circulation Society)JCS |
Journal Title: | 社団法人 日本循環器学会(The Japanese Circulation Society)JCS |
Volume: | 84 |
Issue: | 4 |
Start Page: | 584 |
End Page: | 591 |
Publisher DOI: | 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0225 |
Abstract: | Background: Palliative care is highly relevant for patients with heart failure (HF), and there is a need for quantitative information on quality of care. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) for palliative care of HF patients, and to conduct a practical pilot measurement of the proposed QIs in clinical practice. Methods and Results: We used a modified Delphi technique, a consensus method that involves a comprehensive literature review, face-to-face multidisciplinary panel meeting, and anonymous rating in 2 rounds. A 15-member multidisciplinary expert panel individually rated each potential indicator on a scale of 1 (lowest) to 9 (highest) for appropriateness. All indicators receiving a median score >= 7 without significant disagreement were included in the final set of QIs. Through the consensus-building process, 35 QIs were proposed for palliative care in HF patients. Practical measurement in HF patients (n=131) from 3 teaching hospitals revealed that all of the proposed QIs could be obtained retrospectively from medical records, and the following QIs had low performance (<10%): "Intervention by multidisciplinary team", "Opioid therapy for patients with refractory dyspnea", and "Screening for psychological symptoms". Conclusions: The first set of QIs for palliative care of HF patients was developed and could clarify quantitative information and might improve the quality of care. |
Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode |
Type: | article |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/77815 |
Appears in Collections: | 医学院・医学研究院 (Graduate School of Medicine / Faculty of Medicine) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)
|