|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
International Institute for Zoonosis Control >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >
The performance of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples in comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF, microscopy and culture
This item is licensed under:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Title: | The performance of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples in comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF, microscopy and culture |
Authors: | Phetsuksiri, Benjawan Browse this author | Klayut, Wiphat Browse this author | Rudeeaneksin, Janisara Browse this author | Srisungngam, Sopa Browse this author | Bunchoo, Supranee Browse this author | Toonkomdang, Sarawut Browse this author | Wongchai, Thanee Browse this author | Nakajima, Chie Browse this author →KAKEN DB | Suzuki, Yasuhiko Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Keywords: | LAMP | Tuberculosis | Diagnosis | Sputum |
Issue Date: | 5-Jun-2020 |
Publisher: | Instituto de Medicina Tropical |
Journal Title: | Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo |
Volume: | 62 |
Start Page: | e36 |
Publisher DOI: | 10.1590/S1678-9946202062036 |
Abstract: | Simple, low-cost and effective diagnostic tests for tuberculosis (TB) are needed especially in TB-high burden settings. The present study evaluated the performance of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for diagnosing TB by comparing it to Xpert MTB/RIF, microscopy and culture. In Thailand, a total of 204 excess sputum samples volume after the processing of cultures were used for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) detection by Xpert MTB/RIF and LAMP. Based on culture results as the gold standard, the overall sensitivity of LAMP and Xpert MTB/RIF were 82.1% (126/153; 95% confidential interval [CI]: 75.4-88.98%) and 86.9 % (133/153; 95% CI: 80.5-90.8%) respectively, and the specificity of both tests was 100% (51/51; 95% CI: 93.0-100.0%). In comparison with Xpert MTB/RIF, the sensitivity and specificity of LAMP were 94.7% (126/133; 95% CI: 89.5-97.9%), and 100.0% (73/73; 95% CI: 94.9-100.0%), respectively. The average threshold cycle (Ct) of Xpert MTB/RIF detection for positive and negative LAMP results was statistically different, of 18.4 and 27.0, respectively (p < 0.05). In comparison with the acid-fast staining technique, and analyzing LAMP and Xpert MTB/RIF in smear-negative/ culture-positive specimens, there was an increase of the detection rate by 47.7% (21/44) and 54.6% (24/44). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of LAMP appeared to be comparable to those of Xpert MTB/RIF. We claim that this LAMP has potential to provide a sensitive diagnostic test for the rapid TB diagnosis. It allowed a fast detection of MTB before the cultures and it could be used in resource-limited laboratory settings. |
Rights: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.en |
Type: | article |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/78961 |
Appears in Collections: | 国際連携研究教育局 : GI-CoRE (Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education : GI-CoRE) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc) 人獣共通感染症国際共同研究所 (International Institute for Zoonosis Control) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)
|
|