|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
北方言語研究 = Northern Language Studies >
第11号 >
モンゴル語の第3人称所属語尾niの「対比」について : 日本語の「は」との対照を通して
| Title: | モンゴル語の第3人称所属語尾niの「対比」について : 日本語の「は」との対照を通して |
| Other Titles: | On the Contrastive Use of the 3rd Person Possessive Particle ni in Mongolian : A Comparison with」apaneseContrastive wa |
| Authors: | 那日蘇1 Browse this author |
| Authors(alt): | Narisu1 |
| Keywords: | モンゴル語 | | 日本語 | | 対比専用 | | 対比兼用 | | 構文パターン |
| Issue Date: | 20-Mar-2021 |
| Publisher: | 日本北方言語学会 |
| Journal Title: | 北方言語研究 |
| Journal Title(alt): | Northern Language Studies |
| Volume: | 11 |
| Start Page: | 267 |
| End Page: | 286 |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this paper is to consider the contrastive usage and characteristic of Mongolian third person possessive particle ni by comparing it with wa in Japanese, which has the contrastive usage. Following Noda (1996), we first divide the contrastive wa into two types, namely contrast-only type and contrast/topic amphibious type. Also, the contrastive construction is divided into four types (pattern 1-4). With these classifications, we compare Mongolian ni with Japanese wa. Considering the number of examples, Japanese wa is mainly used as the contrast/topic amphibious type. This is because wa is mainly used as the topic marker, not the contrast marker. On the other hand, it is not clear which is the main usage of Mongolian ni. From the perspective of syntax, it is common for the topic wa and the contrast wa to co-occur in the case of the contrast-only type wa. Conversely, the concurrence is not preferred in Mongolian. Mongolian alternatively uses φ in the position where Japanese uses the topic wa. A number of examples show that the contrastive wa is mainly used in pattern 1 and 4 and the contrastive ni in pattern 4. Regarding pattern 3, we could not find any examples. However, this does not mean that pattern 3 is nonexistent. On the other hand, the syntactic distribution does not show any notable difference in pattern 1. In pattern 2 and 4, however, Mongolian ni can co-occur with interrogative words and have the usage of contrast while it is unlikely that Japanese wa co-occurs with interrogative words. Furthermore, in pattern 4 of both languages the predicates can be easily omitted since the two predicates are often the same. |
| Type: | bulletin (article) |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80934 |
| Appears in Collections: | 北方言語研究 = Northern Language Studies > 第11号
|
|
