HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy >
vol. 13 >

Making Sense of the Knobe-effect : Praise demands both Intention and Voluntariness

Files in This Item:
JAEP13_11-20.pdf356.63 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Making Sense of the Knobe-effect : Praise demands both Intention and Voluntariness
Authors: Zardai, Istvan Zoltan Browse this author
Keywords: action
Issue Date: Feb-2022
Publisher: 北海道大学大学院文学研究院応用倫理・応用哲学研究教育センター
Journal Title: Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy
Volume: 13
Start Page: 11
End Page: 20
Abstract: The paper defends the idea that when we evaluate whether agents deserve praise or blame for their actions, we evaluate both whether their action was intentional, and whether it was voluntary. This idea can explain an asymmetry in blameworthiness and praiseworthiness: Agents can be blamed if they have acted either intentionally or voluntarily. However, to merit praise we expect agents to have acted both intentionally and voluntarily. This asymmetry between demands of praise and blame offers an interpretation of the Knobeeffect: in the well-known experiment people blame a company chairman because, although he harmed the environment unintentionally, he did so voluntarily. In turn, praise is withheld, because the chairman did not benefit the environment intentionally. This is a way of rendering the Knobe-effect a rational outcome. It is an advantage of this position, that the distinction between the intentionality and voluntariness of actions can be upheld, whether or not it is the best explanation of the Knobe-effect.
Type: bulletin (article)
Appears in Collections:Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy > vol. 13

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar_1.0 )

MathJax is now OFF:


 - Hokkaido University