HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Hokkaido University Hospital >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >

Clinical significance of serum and vitreous soluble interleukin-2 receptor in patients with intraocular lymphoma

Files in This Item:

The file(s) associated with this item can be obtained from the following URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02677-4


Title: Clinical significance of serum and vitreous soluble interleukin-2 receptor in patients with intraocular lymphoma
Authors: Suzuki, Kayo Browse this author
Namba, Kenichi Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Kase, Satoru Browse this author
Ogino, Yo Browse this author
Hase, Keitaro Browse this author
Iwata, Daiju Browse this author
Mizuuchi, Kazuomi Browse this author
Hiraoka, Miki Browse this author
Kitaichi, Nobuyoshi Browse this author
Ishida, Susumu Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Keywords: Soluble interleukin-2 receptor
Matrix metalloproteinases
Intraocular lymphoma
Vitreoretinal lymphoma
Central nervous system lymphoma
Issue Date: 10-Nov-2022
Publisher: BioMed Central
Journal Title: BMC ophthalmology
Volume: 22
Issue: 1
Start Page: 428
Publisher DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02677-4
Abstract: Background Intraocular lymphoma (IOL) is a masquerade syndrome that mimics uveitis, making diagnosis difficult. The serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R), which is cleaved by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) -2 and MMP-9, has been recognized as a tumor-related biomarker of malignant lymphomas. The aim of this study was to review the reliability of serum and vitreous sIL-2R for distinguishing IOL from uveitis. Methods Patients who underwent diagnostic vitrectomy for marked vitreous haze at Hokkaido University Hospital between April 2014 and June 2019 were enrolled. The patients were divided into an IOL group and a uveitis group, according to the pathology of their vitreous samples. The IOL group was further divided at the time of vitrectomy into patients who already had extraocular involvement (IOL with extraocular involvement group) and patients with no evidence of having extraocular involvement (IOL without extraocular involvement group). Serum sIL-2R, and intravitreal sIL-2R, MMP-2, and MMP-9 levels were assessed. Results Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients, and 15 eyes of 15 patients were included in the IOL group and uveitis group, respectively. The serum sIL-2R levels were significantly lower in the IOL group than in the uveitis group (P < 0.05), and 20.0% and 66.7% in the IOL and the uveitis group showed high sIL-2R value above the normal range. Vitreous sIL-2R tended to be higher in the IOL group than in the uveitis group (P = 0.80). Serum sIL-2R was significantly lower in the IOL without extraocular involvement group than in the IOL with extraocular involvement group (P < 0.05); 5.9% in the IOL without extraocular involvement group and 50.0% in the IOL with extraocular involvement group showed high sIL-2R value above the normal range. Vitreous sIL-2R, MMP-2, and MMP-9 tended to be higher in the IOL with extraocular involvement group than in the IOL without extraocular involvement group (P = 0.30, < 0.05, 0.16). Conclusions Serum sIL-2R is often within the normal range in IOL patients. Even if it is within the normal range, the possibility of IOL should be considered. Serum sIL-2R is not a reliable biomarker for IOL, whereas vitreous sIL-2R may be useful for the diagnosis of IOL.
Type: article
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/87797
Appears in Collections:北海道大学病院 (Hokkaido University Hospital) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar_1.0 )

MathJax is now OFF:


 

 - Hokkaido University