HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
北方人文研究 = Journal of the Center for Northern Humanities >
第1号 = No.1 >

創られゆく風景 : 北海道のランドスケープデザインにおける政治性と実践

Files in This Item:
KATAGIRI.pdf627.99 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/34541

Title: 創られゆく風景 : 北海道のランドスケープデザインにおける政治性と実践
Other Titles: Making Landscapes : Political Positions and Practices on Landscape Design in Hokkaido
Authors: 片桐, 保昭1 Browse this author
Authors(alt): Katagiri, Yasuaki1
Issue Date: 31-Mar-2008
Publisher: 北海道大学大学院文学研究科北方研究教育センター
Journal Title: 北方人文研究
Journal Title(alt): Journal of the Center for Northern Humanities
Volume: 1
Start Page: 69
End Page: 85
Abstract: This study focuses on landscape design as practicing processes in designing workshop not regarded as modern system of depressing subjectivity. Hokkaido has been treated advanced area of landscape design. But residents are not always participating to construct public gardens. Administrative organizations of public parks want symbolic and clearly meaningful shapes by appropriating previous exiting objects in designing such spaces for the reasons of constructing needs. But designers regard these as capricious things and want more good shapes. These ‘good’ designs are often not objective and cannot explain by official needs. Hence, official symbolic objects are sighted on central symbolic place in the landscape and ‘good’ designed objects are sighted on peripherals and not conspicuous. In these processes, ‘aesthetical’ values without rationality or functionality in modern context are acted as agencies. Because of their ambiguous values, designers’ practices are rather not symbolic and peripheral on the landscape. These practiced designs have interpretative flexibility for each subject to feel the whole landscapes. On these processes of designing landscape, ambiguous agencies are acted to subjects. Landscapes are constructed not only meaningful symbolic objects but also rather not meaningful shapes felt by each subjects. These agencies are peripheral values constructed in each subjects’ experiences: and the processes of acting these agencies in landscape design processes are respected as subjects’ possibility.
Type: bulletin (article)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/34541
Appears in Collections:北方人文研究 = Journal of the Center for Northern Humanities > 第1号 = No.1

Submitter: 片桐 保昭

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar )


 

Feedback - Hokkaido University