|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of International Media, Communication and Tourism Studies / Research Faculty of Media and Communication >
国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル = The Journal of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies >
No.7 >
マックス・ウェーバーの方法論 (2) : 「因果帰属」と「ノモス的知識」
| Title: | マックス・ウェーバーの方法論 (2) : 「因果帰属」と「ノモス的知識」 |
| Other Titles: | Max Weber's Methodology, II : "Casual Attribution" and "Nomological Knowledge" |
| Authors: | 山田, 吉二郎1 Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
| Authors(alt): | Yamada, Kichijiro1 |
| Issue Date: | 28-Nov-2008 |
| Publisher: | 北海道大学大学院国際広報メディア・観光学院 |
| Journal Title: | 国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル |
| Journal Title(alt): | The Journal of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies |
| Volume: | 7 |
| Start Page: | 99 |
| End Page: | 118 |
| Abstract: | In this paper I examine Max Weber's two methodological treatises: "Roscher and Knies" and "Critical Study on Logic of Cultural Sciences". My aim is to analyse Weber's methodology and to make it clear how its components are interrelated. When Weber talks about "lawseeking sciences" and "sciences of reality", his intetion is not to emphasize the existence of two sciences: natural sciences and cultural sciences, but to insist on the existence of two different kinds of causation. In cultural sciences every object of our (historical) study is "what it has become, and not something else" and we must select some "adequate causes" from which the object is supposed to flow out. Weber calls this selection of causes "causal attribution" and he tells that our "nomological knowledge" is the base of the validity of our selections. |
| Type: | bulletin (article) |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35151 |
| Appears in Collections: | 国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル = The Journal of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies > No.7
|
Submitter: 山田 吉二郎
|
