HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of International Media and Communication >
国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル = The Journal of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies >
No.7 >

マックス・ウェーバーの方法論 (2) : 「因果帰属」と「ノモス的知識」

Files in This Item:
p099-118YAMADA.pdf522.37 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35151

Title: マックス・ウェーバーの方法論 (2) : 「因果帰属」と「ノモス的知識」
Other Titles: Max Weber's Methodology, II : "Casual Attribution" and "Nomological Knowledge"
Authors: 山田, 吉二郎 Browse this author
Issue Date: 28-Nov-2008
Publisher: 北海道大学大学院国際広報メディア・観光学院 = Graduate School of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies, Hokkaido University
Journal Title: 国際広報メディア・観光学ジャーナル = The Journal of International Media, Communication, and Tourism Studies
Volume: 7
Start Page: 99
End Page: 118
Abstract: In this paper I examine Max Weber's two methodological treatises: "Roscher and Knies" and "Critical Study on Logic of Cultural Sciences". My aim is to analyse Weber's methodology and to make it clear how its components are interrelated. When Weber talks about "lawseeking sciences" and "sciences of reality", his intetion is not to emphasize the existence of two sciences: natural sciences and cultural sciences, but to insist on the existence of two different kinds of causation. In cultural sciences every object of our (historical) study is "what it has become, and not something else" and we must select some "adequate causes" from which the object is supposed to flow out. Weber calls this selection of causes "causal attribution" and he tells that our "nomological knowledge" is the base of the validity of our selections.
Type: bulletin
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35151
Appears in Collections:No.7

Submitter: 山田 吉二郎

 

Feedback - Hokkaido University