Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Economics and Business / Faculty of Economics and Business >
Discussion paper >
Series A >
Should income inequality be praised? Multiple public goods provision, income distribution, and social welfare
Title: | Should income inequality be praised? Multiple public goods provision, income distribution, and social welfare |
Authors: | Itaya, Jun-ichi Browse this author →KAKEN DB | Mizushima, Atsue Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Keywords: | Public goods | Inequality | Social welfare | Voluntary provision | Income distribution |
Issue Date: | 26-Jan-2016 |
Publisher: | Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Hokkaido University |
Journal Title: | Discussion Paper, Series A |
Volume: | 298 |
Start Page: | 1 |
End Page: | 37 |
Abstract: | We investigate how income inequality affects social welfare in a model of voluntary contributions to multiple pure public goods. Itaya, de Meza, and Myles (1997) show that the maximization of social welfare precludes income equality in a single pure public good model. In contrast, we show that the result of Itaya et al. may not be valid in a case of multiple voluntarily supplied public goods; specifically, we show that not only an income inequality-raising redistribution policy but also an income-equalizing one may raise social welfare. We also show that if altruistically motivated voluntary transfers are allowed, an inequality-raising redistribution policy is no longer effective and leaves social welfare unchanged. |
Type: | bulletin (article) |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60614 |
Appears in Collections: | Discussion paper > Series A
|
|