HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Economics and Business / Faculty of Economics and Business >
Discussion paper >
Series A >

Should income inequality be praised? Multiple public goods provision, income distribution, and social welfare

Files in This Item:
DPA298.pdf624.81 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60614

Title: Should income inequality be praised? Multiple public goods provision, income distribution, and social welfare
Authors: Itaya, Jun-ichi Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Mizushima, Atsue Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Keywords: Public goods
Inequality
Social welfare
Voluntary provision
Income distribution
Issue Date: 26-Jan-2016
Publisher: Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Hokkaido University
Journal Title: Discussion Paper, Series A
Volume: 298
Start Page: 1
End Page: 37
Abstract: We investigate how income inequality affects social welfare in a model of voluntary contributions to multiple pure public goods. Itaya, de Meza, and Myles (1997) show that the maximization of social welfare precludes income equality in a single pure public good model. In contrast, we show that the result of Itaya et al. may not be valid in a case of multiple voluntarily supplied public goods; specifically, we show that not only an income inequality-raising redistribution policy but also an income-equalizing one may raise social welfare. We also show that if altruistically motivated voluntary transfers are allowed, an inequality-raising redistribution policy is no longer effective and leaves social welfare unchanged.
Type: bulletin (article)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/60614
Appears in Collections:Discussion paper > Series A

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar_1.0 )

MathJax is now OFF:


 

 - Hokkaido University