HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Institute for the Advancement of Higher Education >
高等教育ジャーナル = Journal of Higher Education and Lifelong Learning >
第24号 >

高等教育アカデミーによる職能レベル認定 : 訪問調査を基にした評価法のまとめ

Files in This Item:
2411.pdf1.16 MBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: 高等教育アカデミーによる職能レベル認定 : 訪問調査を基にした評価法のまとめ
Other Titles: System for Recognition of Professionalism in Teaching and Learning by the Higher
Authors: 山田, 邦雅1 Browse this author →KAKEN DB
山本, 堅一2 Browse this author
Michal, MAZUR3 Browse this author
Authors(alt): Kunimasa, Yamada1
Kenichi, Yamamoto2
Michal, MAZUR3
Issue Date: Mar-2017
Publisher: 北海道大学高等教育推進機構
Journal Title: 高等教育ジャーナル : 高等教育と生涯学習
Journal Title(alt): Journal of Higher Education and Lifelong Learning
Volume: 24
Start Page: 131
End Page: 136
Abstract: How to evaluate a faculty development program and the teaching performance of professors can be problematic. On the one hand, the Higher Education Academy does recognize the professionalism of teaching and learning of professors and has achieved certain results by certifying more than 85,000 fellows since 2006. The evaluation method of the Higher Education Academy is interesting as a successful case. Therefore we visited the head office of Higher Education Academy (HEA) and interviewed their International Team. In this paper, we will introduce overviews of “HEA fellowships” and “HEA accreditation.” All evaluations are based on a detailed framework, the UK Professional Standards Framework (UKPSF), and this framework is composed of three dimensions: Areas of Activity, Core Knowledge and Professional Values. The “HEA Fellowship Categories” evaluates individual professors, not only by educational ability but also their careers in education according to the UKPSF. With “HEA accreditation” this evaluates the programs for professional development and based on what kind of ability is developed through it according to the UKPSF. For applications, you have to produce reports in the form of templates, with evidential materials attached. These are reviewed by a committee that makes a decision on whether to award accreditation.
Type: bulletin (article)
Appears in Collections:高等教育ジャーナル = Journal of Higher Education and Lifelong Learning > 第24号

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar )

MathJax is now OFF:


Feedback - Hokkaido University