Title: | Corticobasal ganglia projecting neurons are required for juvenile vocal learning but not for adult vocal plasticity in songbirds |
Authors: | Sanchez-Valpuesta, Miguel Browse this author |
Suzuki, Yumeno Browse this author |
Shibata, Yukino Browse this author |
Toji, Noriyuki Browse this author |
Ji, Yu Browse this author |
Afrin, Nasiba Browse this author |
Asogwa, Chinweike Norman Browse this author |
Kojima, Ippei Browse this author |
Mizuguchi, Daisuke Browse this author |
Kojima, Satoshi Browse this author |
Okanoya, Kazuo Browse this author |
Okado, Haruo Browse this author |
Kobayashi, Kenta Browse this author |
Wada, Kazuhiro Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
Keywords: | critical period |
sensorimotor learning |
time-locked firing |
zebra finch |
sensory feedback |
Issue Date: | 5-Nov-2019 |
Publisher: | National Academy of Sciences. |
Journal Title: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) |
Volume: | 116 |
Issue: | 45 |
Start Page: | 22833 |
End Page: | 22843 |
Publisher DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1913575116 |
Abstract: | Birdsong, like human speech, consists of a sequence of temporally precise movements acquired through vocal learning. The learning of such sequential vocalizations depends on the neural function of the motor cortex and basal ganglia. However, it is unknown how the connections between cortical and basal ganglia components contribute to vocal motor skill learning, as mammalian motor cortices serve multiple types of motor action and most experimentally tractable animals do not exhibit vocal learning. Here, we leveraged the zebra finch, a songbird, as an animal model to explore the function of the connectivity between cortex-like (HVC) and basal ganglia (area X), connected by HVC(x) projection neurons with temporally precise firing during singing. By specifically ablating HVC(x) neurons, juvenile zebra finches failed to copy tutored syllable acoustics and developed temporally unstable songs with less sequence consistency. In contrast, HVC(x) -ablated adults did not alter their learned song structure, but generated acoustic fluctuations and responded to auditory feedback disruption by the introduction of song deterioration, as did normal adults. These results indicate that the corticobasal ganglia input is important for learning the acoustic and temporal aspects of song structure, but not for generating vocal fluctuations that contribute to the maintenance of an already learned vocal pattern. |
Type: | article (author version) |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/77803 |
Appears in Collections: | 理学院・理学研究院 (Graduate School of Science / Faculty of Science) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)
|