HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Science / Faculty of Science >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >

The effect of pyridyl anchoring groups at the surfaces of Ru(II)-dyesensitized TiO2 nanoparticles on photocatalytic oxygen evolution

This item is licensed under:Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Files in This Item:
Otsuka_RuPy-paper-14th-for-publication.pdf548.52 kBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80197

Title: The effect of pyridyl anchoring groups at the surfaces of Ru(II)-dyesensitized TiO2 nanoparticles on photocatalytic oxygen evolution
Authors: Otsuka, Hiroki Browse this author
Kobayashi, Atsushi Browse this author
Yoshida, Masaki Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Kato, Masako Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Keywords: Photocatalyst
Water oxidation
Dye-sensitization
Artificial photosynthesis
Ru(II) complex
Issue Date: 15-Jan-2019
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal Title: Journal of photochemistry and photobiology a-chemistry
Volume: 369
Start Page: 189
End Page: 194
Publisher DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.10.019
Abstract: Photocatalytic oxygen evolution driven by two pyridyl-anchor-modified Ru(II) photosensitizers, namely [Ru (bpy)(2)(qpy)](PF6)(2) and [Ru(qpy)(3)](PF6)(2) (RuPy2 and RuPy6; bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, qpy = 2,2'-4,4 ''-4',4'"-quaterpyridine), was examined in order to investigate the influence of pyridyl groups as the connectors that bind both the water-oxidation and water-reduction catalysts. RuPy2 and RuPy6 act as redox photosensitizers in the presence of the S2O82- sacrificial electron acceptor and the K2xCo(3-x)[Fe(CN)(6)](2)center dot nH(2)O, Prussian-blue-type, water-oxidation catalyst; however, their photosensitizing efficiencies were lower than that of [Ru(bpy)(3)](2+) because of their lower reactivities with S2O82-, probably due to steric hindrance associated with the pyridyl groups. Interestingly, the photosensitizing efficiency of RuPy2 was significantly improved through immobilization on TiO2 nanoparticles (RuPy2@TiO2), while the efficiency of RuPy6 was hardly improved by immobilization. These contrasting results indicate that the surface structure of the photosensitizer-immobilized nanoparticle is a crucial factor that determines photosensitizing and/or photocatalytic activity.
Rights: ©2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Type: article (author version)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/80197
Appears in Collections:理学院・理学研究院 (Graduate School of Science / Faculty of Science) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)

Submitter: 小林 厚志

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar_1.0 )

MathJax is now OFF:


 

 - Hokkaido University