HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Medicine / Faculty of Medicine >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >

Predictors of the need for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Files in This Item:
Int J Clin Oncol 26 1179-1187.pdf409.97 kBPDFView/Open
Supplemental table.docxSupplementary Information17 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://hdl.handle.net/2115/85700

Title: Predictors of the need for prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Authors: Kano, Satoshi Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Tsushima, Nayuta Browse this author
Suzuki, Takayoshi Browse this author
Hamada, Seijiro Browse this author
Yokokawa, Taizo Browse this author
Idogawa, Hiroshi Browse this author
Yasuda, Koichi Browse this author
Minatogawa, Hideki Browse this author
Dekura, Yasuhiro Browse this author
Aoyama, Hidefumi Browse this author
Homma, Akihiro Browse this author →KAKEN DB
Keywords: PEG
Head and neck cancer
Chemoradiotherapy
Issue Date: Jul-2021
Publisher: Springer
Journal Title: International journal of clinical oncology
Volume: 26
Issue: 7
Start Page: 1179
End Page: 1187
Publisher DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01889-w
Abstract: Background We investigated whether prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is used effectively for patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and the predictors of the need for PEG. Methods 326 patients with laryngeal, oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancers were retrospectively reviewed. Results The PEG tube use group had more favorable results than the total parenteral nutrition and nasogastric tube groups in terms of rate of serum albumin loss, incidence of severe fever and aspiration pneumonia, CCRT completion rate and hospitalization period. However, it was inferior to oral intake. Analysis of the relative risk of requiring enteral or parenteral nutrition revealed that performance status (PS) 2, primary site (supraglottis, oropharynx, or hypopharynx), N3 disease, and cisplatin were predictors of the need for nutritional support. Conclusions Prophylactic PEG is effective for patients treated with definitive CCRT and is especially required for patients with PS2 or oropharyngeal cancer.
Rights: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in International Journal of Clinical Oncology. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-021-01889-w
Type: article (author version)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/85700
Appears in Collections:医学院・医学研究院 (Graduate School of Medicine / Faculty of Medicine) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)

Submitter: 加納 里志

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar_1.0 )

MathJax is now OFF:


 

 - Hokkaido University