|
Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences >
Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc >
高レベル放射性廃棄物地層処分施設の立地調査受容に信頼と手続き的公正が及ぼす影響
| Title: | 高レベル放射性廃棄物地層処分施設の立地調査受容に信頼と手続き的公正が及ぼす影響 |
| Other Titles: | Effects of trust and procedural fairness on public acceptance of siting a repository for high-level radioactive waste |
| Authors: | 大澤, 英昭1 Browse this author →KAKEN DB | | 大友, 章司2 Browse this author →KAKEN DB | | 広瀬, 幸雄3 Browse this author →KAKEN DB | | 大沼, 進4 Browse this author →KAKEN DB |
| Authors(alt): | Osawa, Hideaki1 | | Ohtomo, Shoji2 | | Hirose, Yukio3 | | Ohnuma, Susumu4 |
| Keywords: | Public acceptance | | Procedural fairness | | Trust | | High-level radioactive waste | | Siting |
| Issue Date: | Jun-2019 |
| Publisher: | 人間環境学研究会 |
| Journal Title: | 人間環境学研究 |
| Journal Title(alt): | Journal of Human Environmental Studies |
| Volume: | 17 |
| Issue: | 1 |
| Start Page: | 59 |
| End Page: | 64 |
| Publisher DOI: | 10.4189/shes.17.59 |
| Abstract: | This study examined the determinants of public acceptance of siting a repository for High-level radioactive waste (HLW), focusing on procedural fairness and trust. The study presumed that interactive effect of procedural fairness × trust on public acceptance exist. To examine the presumption, the study implemented a hypothetical scenario experiment that manipulated two factors: an opportunity of voice as an antecedent of procedural fairness and value similarity to the authority as a component of trust. Three-hundred seventeen people participated in the web-based experiment. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: procedural fairness (voice vs. no voice) × trust (similarity vs. no similarity) factorial design associated with acceptance of siting investigation for a repository of HLW. The experiment measured affective reaction to the siting, and evaluations of procedural fairness, trust, public acceptance in the decision-making process. Results indicated that affective reaction, procedural fairness, and trust determined public acceptance. Moreover, the interactive effect of procedural fairness × trust on public acceptance was found. A process analysis indicated that the effect of procedural fairness was strengthened when the trust on similarity was negative. |
| Type: | article |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2115/85770 |
| Appears in Collections: | 文学院・文学研究院 (Graduate School of Humanities and Human Sciences / Faculty of Humanities and Human Sciences) > 雑誌発表論文等 (Peer-reviewed Journal Articles, etc)
|
Submitter: 大沼 進
|
