HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Communication in Science and Technology Education and Research Program : CoSTEP >
科学技術コミュニケーション = Japanese Journal of Science Communication >
1号 >

コンセンサス会議における円滑なコミュニケーションのための考察 : 「遺伝子組換え作物の栽培について道民が考える『コンセンサス会議』」を事例として

Files in This Item:
JJSC-96-104.pdf1.71 MBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://doi.org/10.14943/17542

Title: コンセンサス会議における円滑なコミュニケーションのための考察 : 「遺伝子組換え作物の栽培について道民が考える『コンセンサス会議』」を事例として
Other Titles: Consideration for Smooth Communication in a Consensus Conference : The Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Organism as a Case Study
Authors: 森岡, 和子1 Browse this author
Authors(alt): MORIOKA, Kazuko1
Keywords: consensus conference
citizen's panel
facilitator
facilitation
workshop
Issue Date: Mar-2007
Publisher: 北海道大学科学技術コミュニケーター養成ユニット
Journal Title: 科学技術コミュニケーション
Journal Title(alt): Journal of Science Communication
Volume: 1
Start Page: 96
End Page: 104
Abstract: Consensus Conference is a type of meeting that makes it possible to include ordinar y people and their experiences in technology assessment. It gives people the opportunity to assess a given technological development and make up their minds about its possibilities and consequences. A citizen's panel, representative of ordinary people with divergent background, has a discussion after having taken information from experts about the technology. Having deepened discussion each other, a citizen's panel completes a final document which contains a clarification and a position of issue. To promote discussion smoothly, a facilitator and staff members of a conference office have to work out the design of conference in detail. The author of this report took part in the Consensus Conference on Genetically Modified Organism held in Hokkaido as a staff member. This is a report that summarized what the staff members of consensus conference can prepare to make citizen's panel feel comfortable and to promote discussion smoothly. The points that should be considered are as follows: ice breaking, communication size, design of a meeting place, open/closed choice of meeting, support of making sentences, and break time.
Type: bulletin (article)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/18947
Appears in Collections:科学技術コミュニケーション = Japanese Journal of Science Communication > 1号

Submitter: 『科学技術コミュニケーション』編集委員会

Export metadata:

OAI-PMH ( junii2 , jpcoar )


 

Feedback - Hokkaido University