HUSCAP logo Hokkaido Univ. logo

Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers >
Communication in Science and Technology Education and Research Program : CoSTEP >
科学技術コミュニケーション = Japanese Journal of Science Communication >
6号 >

「ナノテクノロジーの食品への応用」をめぐる三つの対話 : アップストリーム・エンゲージメントのための手法の比較検討

Files in This Item:
JJSC-6_004.pdf1.11 MBPDFView/Open
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:http://doi.org/10.14943/38449

Title: 「ナノテクノロジーの食品への応用」をめぐる三つの対話 : アップストリーム・エンゲージメントのための手法の比較検討
Other Titles: Research on Three Deliberative Methods in Food Nanotechnologies : Comparative Study for Upstream Engagement
Authors: 三上, 直之1 Browse this author →KAKEN DB
杉山, 滋郎2 Browse this author
高橋, 祐一郎3 Browse this author
山口, 富子4 Browse this author
立川, 雅司5 Browse this author
Authors(alt): Mikami, Naoyuki1
Sugiyama, Shigeo2
Takahashi, Yuichiro3
Yamaguchi, Tomiko4
Tachikawa, Masashi5
Keywords: nanotechnologies
applications in food
upstream engagement
NanoTRI
consensus conference
citizen panel
group interview
science cafe
Issue Date: Sep-2009
Publisher: 北海道大学科学技術コミュニケーター養成ユニット
Journal Title: 科学技術コミュニケーション
Journal Title(alt): Japanese Journal of Science Communication
Volume: 6
Start Page: 50
End Page: 66
Abstract: This paper explores deliberative methods for the general public and experts to have meaningful dialogue and evaluate future technologies at the early stage of their scientific and technological development (upstream engagement). For this purpose, we planned and conducted an experimental dialogue event on the theme of applications of nanotechnologies in food. The event, named NanoTRI, consisted of three types of deliberative methods: consensus conference, group interview, and science cafe. Through this experiment we found that, by utilizing consensus conference and other deliberative methods, it is possible to incorporate various aspects of public values in decision making on nanotechnologies. We also found that a session without experts, group interviewing, is quite useful for seeking frank opinions of the participants while the other two methods are more suitable for provision of information or formation of definite opinions.
Type: bulletin (article)
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2115/39297
Appears in Collections:科学技術コミュニケーション = Japanese Journal of Science Communication > 6号

Submitter: 『科学技術コミュニケーション』編集委員会

 

Feedback - Hokkaido University